Phaeacia Agent Passport
00The document

Passport · spec 0.1 · checked 2026-09-28

Install this agent pick your assistant, copy one block

In the gallery under Research and monitoring, listed 2026-09-28. See the rest of it

Phaeacia Type A · read-notify
Page 1 of 4

Agent
Passport

Bearer

Cited Research Assistant

cited-research-assistant
Purpose

You give it one focused research question and, if you like, the decision the answer will feed; it plans sub-questions, searches the web, throws out irrelevant results, reads the chosen pages in full…

the first line of the owner’s description

The bearer

Page 2 of 4
No portrait
Software bearer
Name
cited-research-assistant
Title
Cited Research Assistant
Issued
2026-09-28
Link expires
Listed in the gallery, does not expire
Capture path
file
Envelope
read-notify
Source stack
python pipeline with a local web form on macOS, local language models, keyless web search plus page fetching in a sandboxed container, optional notes-workspace API
Scrub
regex+llm, owner-reviewed
Signed by owner
Confirmed this description

Source stack is where this agent ran before it was captured. Your rebuild does not need it, and nothing in the install tries to reproduce it.

Observations

You give it one focused research question and, if you like, the decision the answer will feed; it plans sub-questions, searches the web, throws out irrelevant results, reads the chosen pages in full and writes a short evidence brief with a citation on every claim. It runs only when you ask it a question. The brief is for deciding, or for knowing what to dig into next: it shows where sources agree and disagree, flags vendor-reported and estimated figures, keeps publication dates apart from event dates, and writes "Evidence gap" wherever the sources do not answer instead of filling in from general knowledge.

The machine-readable zone

Page 3 of 4
PAPHACITED<RESEARCH<ASSISTANT<<CITED<RESEARCCITEDRESE7PHA2609289F2609289V01C04I04L00Y<12

The real passport format, with real check digits, computed from this file.

Read it field by field
L1 1-2PADocument type. P for passport, A for the read-notify envelope.
L1 3-5PHAIssuing authority. This site checked the format and stored the file.
L1 6-44CITED<RESEARCH<ASSISTANT<<CITED<RESEARCThe name field: the identifier, then the title, split by a double filler.
L2 1-10CITEDRESE7The identifier, and its check digit.
L2 11-13PHAIssuing authority again, where a passport carries the bearer’s nationality. An agent has none.
L2 14-202609289Issued 2026-09-28, and its check digit.
L2 21FCapture path: file.
L2 22-282609289Checked 2026-09-28, and its check digit.
L2 29-43V01C04I04L00Y<1Spec version, 4 capabilities, 4 installable, 0 losses declared, owner confirmed.
L2 442Composite check digit over positions 1-10, 14-20 and 22-43. Positions 11-13, 21 and 44 are excluded, as ICAO 9303 excludes them.

Two lines of 44, in the ICAO 9303 TD3 field positions, with check digits computed on the 7-3-1 weighting. Every value is read off this passport. An agent has no nationality and no date of birth, so those positions carry the capture path and the date this file was checked instead, and the legend above says which is which.

Entry permissions

Page 4 of 4

What you will need

2required

  • Search the open web and read the chosen pages in full
  • Deliver the brief to you

2optional

  • Read documents you hand it, per run or from folders you name
  • Read pages you choose from your notes or wiki workspace, behind your own login

Each one is an account or a permission on your own platform, and you grant it yourself when your assistant asks. This passport carries no credentials, and nothing is granted by reading this page. Declared only means the original agent had it and version 0.1 will not install it.

Search the open web and read the chosen pages in full

every claim in the brief must cite a page that was actually read; search results alone are never cited

Requirement: Required

If you skip it: nothing can be cited, so every sub-question comes back as an evidence gap and the brief says the research cannot inform the decision

Installable in v0.1: yes

GrantedRequired

Read documents you hand it, per run or from folders you name

combines your own material with the web evidence, marked as yours in the source list

Requirement: Optional

If you skip it: the brief rests on web evidence only

Installable in v0.1: yes

GrantedOptional

Read pages you choose from your notes or wiki workspace, behind your own login

brings internal notes in as evidence beside the public sources

Requirement: Optional

If you skip it: the brief rests on web evidence and any documents you hand it

Installable in v0.1: yes

GrantedOptional

Deliver the brief to you

the brief is the whole point; it goes only to you

Requirement: Required

If you skip it: nothing reaches you

Installable in v0.1: yes

GrantedRequired

Granted means version 0.1 will install that capability. Not granted means it is named here, and left out, so you can see what the original could do that your copy will not.

Checked 2026-09-28 against rules 0.1.0 presented 39 times before this

01Evidence

One golden example, copied from the passport.

Golden examples are what the passport offers as evidence that the agent does what it says. Your rebuild is checked against these. This site checked the file's format, not the truth of its examples.

Nothing was elided: the block is the complete brief of the newest saved run, unchanged. It is a template of shape, never expected content: whoever installs this will ask a different question on a different day, read different pages, and different content is the correct result. This run happens to be one where the search found wage figures but no employment studies, so two of its three sub-questions end in evidence gaps; a run with richer evidence has the same headings with more cited bullets and a real conflict under Evidence and counterevidence.

> Values this example instantiated from the per-run form, not fixed parts of the shape: the research question (employment effects of one Swiss canton's minimum wage since 2020), the decision (whether a café should plan for further increases), depth standard (three sub-questions). No date window, geography, preferred or excluded sources, uploaded documents, folders or workspace pages were set, and answer length was the default, standard. Nothing declared-only rendered into it.

Captured 2026-09-27:

## Bottom line The loaded sources confirm that the Canton of Geneva introduced a statutory minimum wage in late 2020, with rates rising from 23 CHF/hour in 2020 to 24.59 CHF/hour by January 2026 [S2, S3]. However, there is no empirical evidence, study, or official statistical report among the loaded sources that analyzes the impact of this wage on employment rates, job creation, or retention in the hospitality or food service sectors [S1–S3]. Inference: The evidence is thin because while the wage levels are documented, the specific employment effects requested by the research question are entirely absent from the available data, making it impossible to assess the labor market impact for your café planning. ## Findings by question ### Q1: What is the current statutory minimum wage level in the Canton of Geneva as of 2020 and subsequent years? * Geneva introduced a minimum wage in September 2020, approved by over 58% of voters, with an initial rate of 23 CHF/hour [S3]. * The wage is indexed annually to the Geneva consumer price index [S2, S3]. * The rate rose to 23.27 CHF/hour in 2021 [S3]. * The rate was set to rise to 24 CHF/hour in 2023 [S3]. * As of January 1, 2026, the general minimum wage will be 24.59 CHF/hour [S1, S2]. * A separate, lower minimum wage applies to agriculture and floriculture, rising to 18.07 CHF/hour in 2026 [S2]. * A derogatory minimum wage of 75% of the standard rate (18.44 CHF/hour for 2026) was voted on for summer student jobs, subject to a referendum in March 2026 [S1]. ### Q2: What empirical studies or official statistical reports analyze the impact of the Geneva minimum wage on employment rates in the hospitality and food service sectors since its introduction? * Evidence gap: No loaded source contains empirical studies, academic research, or official statistical reports analyzing the impact of the Geneva minimum wage on employment rates in any sector, including hospitality and food service. * The loaded sources are limited to news reports on wage levels [S3] and official government announcements regarding wage adjustments and legal modifications [S1, S2]. ### Q3: What are the findings regarding job creation, retention, or reduction in Geneva's service industry following the minimum wage adjustment? * Evidence gap: No loaded source reports data or findings on job creation, retention, or reduction in Geneva's service industry following the 2020 minimum wage introduction. * The sources do not discuss labor market outcomes, hiring trends, or business responses in the hospitality sector. ## Evidence and counterevidence * **Wage Levels:** There is strong agreement between the official cantonal sources [S1, S2] and the news report [S3] regarding the timeline and amounts of minimum wage increases from 2020 to 2026. * **Employment Impact:** There is no evidence to weigh because no source provides data on employment effects. No counter-source was found among the loaded pages because no source addressed the employment impact question. ## Implications * Inference: Since the loaded sources provide no data on how the minimum wage has affected employment in Geneva's service sector, you cannot rely on this evidence to predict whether further wage increases will lead to job losses or retention issues for your café. * Inference: The absence of employment data means the decision to plan for further increases must rely on other factors, such as your specific business margins, local competitor practices, or qualitative feedback from other local business owners, rather than empirical labor market studies. ## Limitations * Evidence gap: The research question specifically asks for studies on employment effects, but no such studies were loaded. The available sources only cover wage rates and legal frameworks. * Evidence gap: No source reports prices or employment data after 2025; a statistics-office price series or labor market report would be needed to answer this. * Source Type: The sources are primarily news reports [S3] and government press releases [S1, S2]. These are not empirical studies and do not contain labor market analysis. * Rejected Sources: Several potentially relevant sources (e.g., from eda.admin.ch, lexology.com, rister.ch) were rejected or could not be loaded. The rejected aggregator (rister.ch) was deemed less authoritative, but the rejected official government pages (eda.admin.ch) might have contained relevant legal or statistical context that was inaccessible. ## Sources - [S1] Salaire des jobs d'été : la modification votée par le Grand Conseil sera soumise au peuple | ge.ch. https://www.ge.ch/actualite/salaire-jobs-ete-modification-votee-grand-conseil-sera-soumise-au-peuple-7-11-2025 (publication date not stated; retrieved 2026-09-27) - [S2] Le salaire minimum genevois 2026 s'établira à 24.59 fr. de l'heure | ge.ch. https://www.ge.ch/actualite/salaire-minimum-genevois-2026-etablira-2459-fr-heure-1-10-2025 (publication date not stated; retrieved 2026-09-27) - [S3] Geneva to raise its minimum wage in 2023. https://www.thelocal.ch/20221021/geneva-to-raise-its-minimum-wage-in-2023 (publication date not stated; retrieved 2026-09-27) ## What to do next 1. Request access to official labor market statistics from the Geneva cantonal government (e.g., CSME reports) to see if any employment data has been published since 2020. 2. Consult with local hospitality industry associations in Geneva to gather qualitative insights on hiring trends and wage impacts. 3. Review financial projections for your café under different wage scenarios (e.g., 24.59 CHF vs. potential future increases) to assess affordability independently of employment studies.
02Install

Pick where you are installing, then paste the block into that assistant.

You get one branch, not all four. The other options stay available if you picked wrong.

Building the block for this platform.